বুধবার, ২ জানুয়ারি, ২০১৩

Bigger fights loom after tax deadline deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans looked ahead on Wednesday toward the next round of even bigger budget fights after reaching a hard-fought "fiscal cliff" deal that narrowly averted potentially devastating tax hikes and spending cuts.

The agreement, approved late on Tuesday by the Republican-led House of Representatives after a bitter political struggle, was a victory for Obama, who had won re-election on a promise to address budget woes in part by raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans.

But it set up political showdowns over the next two months on spending cuts and on raising the nation's limit on borrowing. Republicans, angry the deal did little to curb the federal deficit, promised to use the debt ceiling debate to win deep spending cuts next time.

"Our opportunity here is on the debt ceiling," Republican Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania said on MSNBC, adding Republicans would have the political leverage against Obama in that debate. "We Republicans need to be willing to tolerate a temporary, partial government shutdown, which is what that could mean."

Republicans, who acknowledged they had lost the fiscal cliff fight by agreeing to raise taxes on the wealthy without gaining much in return, vowed the next deal would have to include significant cuts in government benefit programs like Medicare and Medicaid health care for retirees and the poor that were the biggest drivers of federal debt.

"This is going to be much uglier to me than the tax issue ... this is going to be about entitlement reform," Republican Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee said on CNBC.

"This is the debate that's going to be far more serious. Hopefully, now that we have this other piece behind us - hopefully - we'll deal in a real way with the kinds of things our nation needs to face," he said.

Obama urged "a little less drama" when the Congress and White House next address thorny fiscal issues like the government's rapidly mounting $16 trillion debt load.

The fiscal cliff showdown had worried businesses and financial markets, and U.S. stocks soared at the opening after lawmakers agreed to the deal.

The Dow Jones industrial average surged 262.45 points, or 2.00 percent, at 13,366.59. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index was up 29.79 points, or 2.09 percent, at 1,455.98. The Nasdaq Composite Index was up 77.45 points, or 2.57 percent, at 3,096.97.

The crisis ended when dozens of Republicans in the House of Representatives buckled and backed a bill passed by the Democratic-controlled Senate that hiked taxes on households earning more than $450,000 annually. Spending cuts of $109 billion in military and domestic programs were delayed only for two months.

Economists had warned the fiscal cliff of across-the-board tax hikes and spending cuts would have punched a $600 billion hole in the economy this year and threatened to send the country back into recession.

Obama Praises Deal, Says There's More to Be DonePresident Obama is praising the bill that staves off the fiscal cliff tax hikes and spending cuts. The House of Representatives followed the Senate's lead, and passed the bill late Tuesday. (Jan. 2)

RELUCTANT REPUBLICANS

House Republicans had mounted a late effort to add hundreds of billions of dollars in spending cuts to the package and spark a confrontation with the Senate, but it failed.

In the end, they reluctantly approved the Senate bill by a bipartisan vote of 257 to 167 and sent it on to Obama to sign into law. "We are ensuring that taxes aren't increased on 99 percent of our fellow Americans," said Republican Representative David Dreier of California.

The vote underlined the precarious position of House Speaker John Boehner, who will ask his Republicans to re-elect him as speaker on Thursday when a new Congress is sworn in. Boehner backed the bill but most House Republicans, including his top lieutenants, voted against it.

The speaker had sought to negotiate a "grand bargain" with Obama to overhaul the U.S. tax code and rein in health and retirement programs that will balloon in coming decades as the population ages.

But Boehner could not unite his members behind an alternative to Obama's tax measures.

Income tax rates will now rise on individuals earning more than $400,000 and families earning more than $450,000 per year, and the amount of deductions they can take to lower their tax bill will be limited.

Low temporary rates that have been in place for the past decade will be made permanent for less-affluent taxpayers, along with a range of targeted tax breaks put in place to fight the 2009 economic downturn.

However, workers will see up to $2,000 more taken out of their paychecks annually with the expiration of a temporary payroll tax cut.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said the bill will increase budget deficits by nearly $4 trillion over the coming 10 years, compared to the budget savings that would occur if the extreme measures of the cliff were to kick in.

But the measure will actually save $650 billion during that time period when measured against the tax and spending policies that were in effect on Monday, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an independent group that has pushed for more aggressive deficit savings.

(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey and Richard Cowan; Editing by Jackie Frank)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/house-republicans-weigh-last-ditch-challenge-fiscal-deal-005743252--business.html

Incumbent politico Tammy Baldwin house of representatives paul ryan michele bachmann donald trump

Help to evaluate the mix? - Renoise Forums

Jump to content

Example
#{example}
"); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['togglesource'] = new Template("
??? Cancel Source Edit
"); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['toolbar'] = new Template(""); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['button'] = new Template("
  • "); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['menu_item'] = new Template("
  • #{title}
  • "); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['togglesource'] = new Template("
    ??? Cancel Source Edit
    "); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['emoticons_showall'] = new Template(""); ipb.editor_values.get('templates')['emoticon_wrapper'] = new Template("

    Emoticons

    "); // Add smilies into the mix ipb.editor_values.set( 'show_emoticon_link', false ); ipb.editor_values.set( 'bbcodes', $H({"acronym":{"id":"8","title":"Acronym","desc":"Allows you to make an acronym that will display a description when moused over","tag":"acronym","useoption":"1","example":"[acronym='Laugh Out Loud']lol[/acronym]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"Enter the description for this acronym (EG: Laugh Out Loud)","menu_content_text":"Enter the acronym (EG: lol)","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"entry":{"id":"35","title":"Blog Entry Link","desc":"This tag provides an easy way to link to a blog entry.","tag":"entry","useoption":"1","example":"[entry=100]Click me![/entry]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"blog":{"id":"34","title":"Blog Link","desc":"This tag provides an easy way to link to a blog.","tag":"blog","useoption":"1","example":"[blog=100]Click me![/blog]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"code":{"id":"13","title":"Code","desc":"Allows you to enter general code","tag":"code","useoption":"0","example":"[code]$text = 'Some long code here';[/code]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"embed":{"id":"37","title":"embed","desc":"Allows you to embed video material","tag":"embed","useoption":"0","example":"[embed]src=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-2823239341954301626&hl=nl width=478 height=326[/embed]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"extract":{"id":"33","title":"Extract Blog Entry","desc":"This will allow users to define an extract for an entry. Only this piece of the entry will be displayed on the main blog page and will show up in the RSS feed.","tag":"extract","useoption":"0","example":"[extract]This is an example![/extract]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"hr":{"id":"12","title":"Horizontal Rule","desc":"Adds a horizontal rule to separate text","tag":"hr","useoption":"0","example":"[hr]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"1","optional_option":"0","image":""},"html":{"id":"15","title":"HTML Code","desc":"Allows you to enter formatted/syntax-highlighted HTML code","tag":"html","useoption":"0","example":"[html][/html]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"member":{"id":"31","title":"Member","desc":"Given a member name, a link is automatically generated to the member's profile","tag":"member","useoption":"1","example":"[member=admin] runs this site.","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"1","optional_option":"0","image":""},"php":{"id":"14","title":"PHP Code","desc":"Allows you to enter PHP code into a formatted/highlighted syntax box","tag":"php","useoption":"0","example":"[php]$variable = true;\n\nprint_r($variable);[/php]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"post":{"id":"6","title":"Post Link","desc":"This tag provides an easy way to link to a post.","tag":"post","useoption":"1","example":"[post=1]Click me![/post]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"Enter the Post ID","menu_content_text":"Enter the title for this link","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"snapback":{"id":"1","title":"Post Snap Back","desc":"This tag displays a little linked image which links back to a post - used when quoting posts from the board. Opens in same window by default.","tag":"snapback","useoption":"0","example":"[snapback]100[/snapback]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"spoiler":{"id":"7","title":"Spoiler","desc":"Spoiler tag","tag":"spoiler","useoption":"0","example":"[spoiler]Some hidden text[/spoiler]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"Enter the text to be masked","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"sql":{"id":"16","title":"SQL Code","desc":"Allows you to enter formatted/syntax-highlighted SQL code","tag":"sql","useoption":"0","example":"[sql]SELECT p.*, t.* FROM posts p LEFT JOIN topics t ON t.tid=p.topic_id WHERE t.tid=7[/sql]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"topic":{"id":"5","title":"Topic Link","desc":"This tag provides an easy way to link to a topic","tag":"topic","useoption":"1","example":"[topic=1]Click me![/topic]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"Enter the topic ID","menu_content_text":"Enter the title for this link","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"twitter":{"id":"36","title":"Twitter","desc":"A tag to link to a user's twitter account","tag":"twitter","useoption":"0","example":"[twitter]userName[/twitter]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":"twitter.png"},"wiki":{"id":"38","title":"Wiki tag","desc":"This tag links to the wiki.","tag":"wiki","useoption":"0","example":"[wiki]Main Page[/wiki]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"xml":{"id":"17","title":"XML Code","desc":"Allows you to enter formatted/syntax-highlighted XML code","tag":"xml","useoption":"0","example":"[xml]\n \n Test\n \n[/xml]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"youtube":{"id":"45","title":"YouTube","desc":"Just add the Youtube code to embed it.","tag":"youtube","useoption":"0","example":"[youtube]zXuyVKUesbw[/youtube]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""},"br":{"id":"43","title":"[br]","desc":"Add an additional linebreak","tag":"br","useoption":"0","example":"[br][/br]","switch_option":"0","menu_option_text":"","menu_content_text":"","single_tag":"0","optional_option":"0","image":""}}) ); ipb.vars['emoticon_url'] = "http://forum.renoise.com/public/style_emoticons/default"; //Search Setup ipb.vars['search_type'] = 'forum'; ipb.vars['search_type_id'] = 12; ipb.vars['search_type_2'] = 'topic'; ipb.vars['search_type_id_2'] = 36925; // Delete stuff set up ipb.topic.deleteUrls['hardDelete'] = new Template("http://forum.renoise.com/index.php?app=forums&module=moderate&section=moderate&do=04&f=12&t=36925&st=&auth_key=880ea6a14ea49e853634fbdc5015a024&p=#{pid}"); ipb.topic.deleteUrls['softDelete'] = new Template("http://forum.renoise.com/index.php?app=forums&module=moderate&section=moderate&do=postchoice&tact=sdelete&t=36925&f=12&auth_key=880ea6a14ea49e853634fbdc5015a024&selectedpids[#{pid}]=#{pid}&pid=#{pid}"); //]]>
    • You cannot start a new topic
    • You cannot reply to this topic

    #1 User is offline ? tomij7?

    • Group: Normal Members
    • Posts: 78
    • Joined: 14-March 12
    • Gender:Male

    Posted Yesterday, 08:19 PM

    I've realized that my songs sound pretty awful when listening on different speakers.

    So lately I've been reading Mixing Secrets For The Small Studio by Mike Senior. I've tried plenty of stuff that Mike is writing about: mono compatibility, mix structure, doubling, ducking etc.

    I remixed one of my previous compositions. Basically I opened Renoise, throw away all effects and reworked the mix from the start.

    But I know that my ears alone won't tell me the truth. So now I'm asking help: how does this sound to you? How would you improve this/where did I go wrong? Really, any comments would be appreciated!

    Listen on Soundcloud.com

    0


    #2 User is offline ? thanatos?

    • Group: Normal Members
    • Posts: 140
    • Joined: 22-September 10

    Posted Yesterday, 11:20 PM

    i would try some NY comp on the drum bus but other then that it's all good for me

    0


    #3 User is offline ? oneunkind?

    • Group: Normal Members
    • Posts: 88
    • Joined: 01-July 12

    Posted Today, 03:33 AM

    Moving acoustic guitar parts further away from center should help clear up the sound of the drum kit, too.

    0


    Share this topic:


    • You cannot start a new topic
    • You cannot reply to this topic


    Source: http://forum.renoise.com/index.php?/topic/36925-help-to-evaluate-the-mix/

    tornados dr. seuss dr seuss the temptations rush limbaugh sandra fluke green book some like it hot

    Alignments

    LORE: The Heroes Legacy

    Quests have rised upon the lands, the waterfalls tell fables about the sounds of blade clashing. (WIP but accepting characters)

    Owner:

    Game Masters:

    This topic is an Out Of Character part of the roleplay, ?LORE: The Heroes Legacy?. Anything posted here will also show up there.

    Topic Tags:

    Forum for completely Out of Character (OOC) discussion, based around whatever is happening In Character (IC). Discuss plans, storylines, and events; Recruit for your roleplaying game, or find a GM for your playergroup.
    Lawful Good
    Lawful Good is known as the "Saintly" or "Crusader" alignment. A Lawful Good character typically acts with compassion, and always with honor and a sense of duty. A Lawful Good nation would consist of a well-organized government that works for the benefit of its citizens. Lawful Good characters include righteous knights, paladins, and most dwarves. Lawful Good creatures include the noble golden dragons.
    Lawful Good characters, especially paladins, may sometimes find themselves faced with the dilemma of whether to obey law or good when the two conflict?for example, upholding a sworn oath when it would lead innocents to come to harm?or conflicts between two orders, such as between their religious law and the law of the local ruler.

    Neutral Good
    Neutral Good is known as the "Benefactor" alignment. A Neutral Good character is guided by his conscience and typically acts altruistically, without regard for or against Lawful precepts such as rules or tradition. A Neutral Good character has no problems with co-operating with lawful officials, but does not feel beholden to them. In the event that doing the right thing requires the bending or breaking of rules, they do not suffer the same inner conflict that a Lawful Good character would.

    Chaotic Good
    Chaotic Good is known as the "Beatific," "Rebel," or "Cynic" alignment. A Chaotic Good character favors change for a greater good, disdains bureaucratic organizations that get in the way of social improvement, and places a high value on personal freedom, not only for oneself, but for others as well. They always intend to do the right thing, but their methods are generally disorganized and often out of alignment with the rest of society. They may create conflict in a team if they feel they are being pushed around, and often view extensive organization and planning as pointless, preferring to improvise.

    Lawful Neutral
    Lawful Neutral is called the "Judge" or "Disciplined" alignment. A Lawful Neutral character typically believes strongly in Lawful concepts such as honor, order, rules and tradition, and often follows a personal code. A Lawful Neutral society would typically enforce strict laws to maintain social order, and place a high value on traditions and historical precedent. Examples of Lawful Neutral characters might include a soldier who always follows orders, a judge or enforcer that adheres mercilessly to the word of the law, and a disciplined monk.
    Characters of this alignment are neutral with regard to good and evil. This does not mean that Lawful Neutral characters are amoral or immoral, or do not have a moral compass, but simply that their moral considerations come a distant second to what their code, tradition, or law dictates. They typically have a strong ethical code, but it is primarily guided by their system of belief, not by a commitment to good or evil.

    Neutral
    Neutral alignment, also referred to as True Neutral or Neutral Neutral, is called the "Undecided" or "Nature's" alignment. This alignment represents Neutral on both axes, and tends not to feel strongly towards any alignment. A farmer whose primary overriding concern is to feed his family is of this alignment. Most animals, lacking the capacity for moral judgment, are of this alignment since they are guided by instinct rather than conscious decision. Many roguish characters who play all sides to suit themselves are also of this alignment (such as a weapon merchant with no qualms selling his wares to both sides of a war for a profit).
    Some Neutral characters, rather than feeling undecided, are committed to a balance between the alignments. They may see good, evil, law and chaos as simply prejudices and dangerous extremes. Mordenkainen is one such character who takes this concept to the extreme, dedicating himself to a detached philosophy of neutrality to ensure that no one alignment or power takes control of the Flanaess.
    Druids frequently follow this True Neutral dedication to balance, and under Advanced Dungeons & Dragons rules were required to be this alignment. In an example given in the 2nd Edition Player's Handbook, a typical druid might fight against a band of marauding gnolls, only to switch sides to save the gnolls' clan from being totally exterminated.

    Chaotic Neutral
    Chaotic Neutral is called the "Anarchist" or "Free Spirit" alignment. A character of this alignment is an individualist who follows his or her own heart, and generally shirks rules and traditions. Although they promote the ideals of freedom, it is their own freedom that comes first. Good and Evil come second to their need to be free, and the only reliable thing about them is how totally unreliable they are. Chaotic Neutral characters are free-spirited and do not enjoy the unnecessary suffering of others, but if they join a team, it is because that team's goals happen to coincide with their own at the moment. They invariably resent taking orders and can be very selfish in their pursuit of personal goals. A Chaotic Neutral character does not have to be an aimless wanderer; they may have a specific goal in mind, but their methods of achieving that goal are often disorganized, unorthodox, or entirely unpredictable.
    A subset of Chaotic Neutral is: "strongly Chaotic Neutral"; describing a character who behaves chaotically to the point of appearing insane. Characters of this type may regularly change their appearance and attitudes for the sake of change and intentionally disrupt organizations for the sole reason of disrupting a lawful institution. Characters of this type include the Xaositects from the Planescape setting, and Hennet from the third edition Player's Handbook. In Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, Chaotic Neutral was mistakenly assumed to refer to this subset.

    Lawful Evil
    Lawful Evil is referred to as the "Dominator" or "Diabolic" alignment. Characters of this alignment see a well-ordered system as being easier to exploit, and show a combination of desirable and undesirable traits; while they usually obey their superiors and keep their word, they care nothing for the rights and freedoms of other individuals and are not averse to twisting the rules to work in their favor. Examples of this alignment include tyrants, devils, undiscriminating mercenary types who have a strict code of conduct, and loyal soldiers who enjoy the act of killing.
    Like Lawful Good Paladins, Lawful Evil characters may sometimes find themselves faced with the dilemma of whether to obey law or evil when the two conflict. However, their issues with Law versus Evil are more concerned with "Will I get caught?" versus "How does this benefit me?"

    Neutral Evil
    Neutral Evil is called the "Malefactor" alignment. Characters of this alignment are typically selfish and have no qualms about turning on their allies-of-the-moment, and usually make allies primarily to further their own goals. They have no compunctions about harming others to get what they want, but neither will they go out of their way to cause carnage or mayhem when they see no direct benefit to it. They abide by laws for only as long as it is convenient for them. A villain of this alignment can be more dangerous than either Lawful or Chaotic Evil characters, since she or he is neither bound by any sort of honor or tradition nor disorganized and pointlessly violent.
    Examples are an assassin who has little regard for formal laws but does not needlessly kill, a henchman who plots behind her or his superior's back, or a mercenary who switches sides if made a better offer.

    Chaotic Evil
    Chaotic Evil is referred to as the "Destroyer" or "Demonic" alignment. Characters of this alignment tend to have no respect for rules, other people's lives, or anything but their own desires, which are typically selfish and cruel. They set a high value on personal freedom, but do not have any regard for the lives or freedom of other people. They do not work well in groups, as they resent being given orders, and usually behave themselves only out of fear of punishment.
    It is not compulsory for a Chaotic Evil character to be constantly performing sadistic acts just for the sake of being evil, or constantly disobeying orders just for the sake of causing chaos. They do however enjoy the suffering of others, and view honor and self-discipline as weaknesses. Serial killers and monsters of limited intelligence are typically Chaotic Evil.

    User avatar
    Arch_Demon666
    Member for 1 years



    Post a reply

    RolePlayGateway is a site built by a couple roleplayers who wanted to give a little something back to the roleplay community. The site has no intention of earning any profit, and is paid for out of their own pockets.

    If you appreciate what they do, feel free to donate your spare change to help feed them on the weekends. After selecting the amount you want to donate from the menu, you can continue by clicking on PayPal logo.

    Who is online

    Registered users: *Reckless, 0neTailedf0x*, Addrinvan, AdmireAtStuff*, Ahri*, Akita*, AliceTheDark*, Aniihya, Anuwa*, ArabellaDemonte, Arch_Demon666*, Areomancer*, ArgoYamato, AriaSama123, Arik223*, Aryutsuki*, AvengerSpirit*, Azrieldemourn*, bandgeek*, Banshee, Beach-Born-Boy, Blackbird26*, BleedingLover, BlueWind_22, boultinator93*, Bromander Shepard, Buddywazzizname, Canibelle, CarliaRhian123*, ceh12*, ChaoticMarin*, Chari, CharlotteV*, chrono*, cirrus_sd*, Cloasse*, cmpuncle, Colonel_Masters*, CptxMorgan, Crickets..., CriminalMinds*, Crooked Thoughts*, Dark Star*, DarkCookie97, deathrisesagain, DemiKara*, Diarmuid O'Dyna, Disarmhxc*, DocBlargle, DontBeMad*, DreamerOnTheStars*, Drogyn*, DuBois_Scarlett*, El_Gringo, Endgame*, Essence, EternalSonata.*, evilfang, Exabot [Bot], Fabricator*, Firewind*, Flame1819, Floorgan*, Forget~Me~Not*, Forsaken Heart, FreeRunner*, fullmetal642, Gasmask, Genesis Rhapsodos, Ghost_Scar*, Gintoki Sakata, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, GotDraggedIntoThis*, graphicromantics, Half-Dragon*, Hallowed777*, HansenetteHeart*, Harlequin Smile*, Hazezon*, HereMeNow*, Himekura*, Howlkin Stranger*, iCat*, Igari*, Imagine That!, Imehal, itookaChance, Izzyvamp, jackrules158, Jadeling Hawkins, Joesepheus*, jukuma, KameJLa, Kawaii Desu*, krabbypatties, Kravos*, Kuroe, LadyNightshade, Laura-Dora*, legacy14, Leon21, Lerke, Liberator600*, Liliepanda*, Link Mantis*, Little Fox*, LittlexVamp*, Lolkatlove*, Lufia*, LunaSpirit*, Macayle Nighteyes*, Magix, Malfunction*, MaliceInWonderland, MarchHare*, Marco Chain*, MarissaG523*, marksmanoftruth*, Mela*, Merusagon, Miss_Dreamer*, miz_reichul, mjlavalleejr, Mr Lynch*, MSNbot Media, NasiaWords, Nekohina*, Nevan*, Nevermore90, nightwolf, Nikolai*, Nima*, No-one-special, Nujuer*, OFortune*, Ottoman*, OurStars*, Patcharoo, pieluver*, PirateofPie*, Polarisbear12, Princess Awinita*, Purpl3_Flam3s*, R1LEY, RacoonMoon()*, Raidose*, Raize*, rdaydreamer*, RedPinkCyanOrange*, remy6archer, RiPjAW 0x3, Roku Mushabuki*, Rougeshadow*, Rulke*, Ryuu Takeshi, S1mon*, SarcasticIrony, Saviarre*, Scarlet Loup, Script*, Seirei*, Shadow_676*, shadowty, Shanatos*, Shiki29, Shugo Seikatsu*, silentawakening, Silverlight138*, SkullsandSlippers, Skwidge, Skyeblueme3*, SleepyShadow*, smrtazz13, Snow*, Something?, Sorella*, Specialist443*, SpirtiedCrumpets, Stark Contrast, Starlight77*, Stella11*, Strawberrykiss46*, Stryk33*, Subedei, SugarPlum2*, SumErgoSum*, SuperNinjaRoo, supertoastgirl, Sweet Angel Jocelyn, Syshil*, Tainted Twinkee*, Talisman, Temple*, TheEclips3*, Thundergod1020, tigerking1292, Tiko*, Towels0*, Tsukiakari*, twi-twi, Two*, Tybalt Malav?*, Tylerjohnny1, Ulfunn*, UltraVioleta, umbra Alastor*, Varyar*, Vestiline*, Vexilous*, VindicatedPurpose, Vinn, viper45*, VitaminHeart*, WalterF, WaltJRimmer, wolfoftheage*, xLithium, XShishioX*, YellowGrand*, Yolo, ZeakNato, Zetta*, Ziddie, Zitacamron95, ZombieGil

    Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/7ripCex0HO0/viewtopic.php

    hook troy miracle andy whitfield kennedy demi moore roy oswalt

    Kelly a top NFL target again

    Oregon head coach Chip Kelly laughs as he answers a reporter's question during media day for the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football game, Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, in Scottsdale, Ariz. Oregon is scheduled to play Kansas State on Jan. 3, 2013, in Glendale. (AP Photo/Paul Connors)

    Oregon head coach Chip Kelly laughs as he answers a reporter's question during media day for the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football game, Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, in Scottsdale, Ariz. Oregon is scheduled to play Kansas State on Jan. 3, 2013, in Glendale. (AP Photo/Paul Connors)

    Oregon offensive lineman Kyle Long, left, interviews head coach Chip Kelly during media day for the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football game, Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, in Scottsdale, Ariz. Oregon is scheduled to play Kansas State on Jan. 3, 2013, in Glendale. (AP Photo/Paul Connors)

    (AP) ? One of the first questions Oregon coach Chip Kelly was asked after arriving in Arizona for the Fiesta Bowl was about the possibility of coaching in the NFL.

    The are-you-going-to-the-NFL questions haven't let up in the five days since and only figure to pick up after seven coaches were fired Monday.

    Deflection has been Kelly's defense since the rumors started and it was no different after all those NFL openings cropped up.

    "I've got a game to play," Kelly said during the Fiesta Bowl's media day on Monday. "We're playing in the Fiesta Bowl. That's the biggest thing in my life. If I allowed other things to get into my life, then they would be distractions, but there aren't. Our focus 100 percent is on the Fiesta Bowl."

    Kelly has been an intriguing candidate for NFL teams for a few years.

    The 49-year-old coach is known as an offensive innovator and his fast-paced, high-scoring offense has led to the most successful stretch in Oregon's history.

    The fifth-ranked Ducks have gone to four straight BCS bowl games, a run that includes a trip to the 2011 national championship game, Oregon's first Rose Bowl win in 95 years last season and Thursday night's Fiesta Bowl against No. 5 Kansas State at University of Phoenix Stadium.

    The speculation over the past few years has been that Kelly has his eye on an NFL job and he even talked to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers last year before saying he had unfinished business in Eugene.

    The rumors began to pick up this season and followed him to the desert, where he's been asked about the NFL every day he's been here and has given a different version of the same answer every time.

    "My heart is to win today and that's it," Kelly said. "I know everybody wants to hear a different answer. And I know that at times when I don't give you guys the answer that you guys want, then I'm being evasive. I'm not being evasive."

    One reason that Kelly's stock is so high is that NFL teams are starting to embrace the hurry-all-the-time offense he has nearly perfected in Eugene.

    In college, coaches have latched onto the no-huddle offense, with teams across the country employing a version of it.

    NFL teams have always seemed to be reluctant to borrow from the college ranks, sticking to smash-mouth football for years even while college offenses had unprecedented success with the spread.

    The mindset has changed, at least some, over the past few years as teams have looked for ways to get ahead of the defenses. Several NFL teams have gone the high-octane route on offense, including New England, Seattle, Washington and Green Bay, to a certain extent.

    Kelly has been the standard-bearer for the redline approach in college. His Ducks have ranked no lower than sixth in the country in rushing yards since he became offensive coordinator in 2007 and have been in the top 10 in scoring and total offense every year but one.

    With success like that, it's no wonder he's become a popular target for NFL teams.

    "My whole thing since I've been here is that I'm going to do the best job I can every single day," Kelly said. "If that's good enough that other people look at me sometimes, I don't really care about that. I think too many people live in the future. We live in the moment."

    The key this week will be keeping the Ducks in the moment as the rumors swirl.

    Kelly is reported to be the top candidate to replace Pat Shurmur with the Cleveland Browns and would be a popular choice for the Philadelphia Eagles now that Andy Reid is gone. Arizona, Buffalo, Chicago, San Diego and Kansas City also are without coaches and could come calling on Kelly as well.

    Whatever Kelly does behind the scenes, he's tried to make sure it doesn't become a distraction for his team as it prepares to play another team that had national-championship hopes that lasted deep into the season.

    "I never said a word to our guys about it," Kelly said. "They understand what the task is at hand. I don't think about it. They don't think about it, so ..."

    So far, it seems to be working.

    Kelly's players have taken to his stick-to-what's-in-front-of-you mentality when it comes to games and have done the same thing with the rumors about their coach possibly leaving.

    "It's not really distracting," Oregon running back DeAnthony Thomas said. "Our main focus is just winning this game right now and just celebrating as a team."

    Celebrating or lamenting, Kelly likely will face a decision not long after it's over.

    Associated Press

    Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2013-01-01-FBC-T25-Fiesta-Bowl-Kelly's-Future/id-0e2eed0559d6484b9825b3e1fb82733f

    ryan braun bryce harper may day stoudemire jordan hill tony nominations dark knight trailer

    Communications | Caregiving.com

    (From the Community Caregiving Journal 3-word prompt Pretend, Practice, Promise.)

    1. Written word

    I have begun to put a promise to myself into practice. It is slow going, but it is no longer at a standstill.

    ?Yes, I?m finally writing back! I?m sorry it?s taken me so long, but for me it?s mainly been a question of just what to say and how to say it.?

    I hadn?t written back to these people in years and I?ve known them for almost 30. I had read their annual letters about their lives, their children?s lives, and now their grandchildren?s ? and then had placed those letters aside.

    Like several others.

    Some of my replies will be only short notes. Others will contain more detail.

    ?About a year ago [my partner] was diagnosed with MS, but its main damage is in her prefrontal cortex. This made it very hard to diagnose, and we?ve been through years of tests, specialists, and misdiagnoses. Her current definitive diagnosis is MS that acts like traumatic brain injury.?

    That?s not the hard part to report. My partner and I agree on that information. For some replies, my letter will stop about there.

    But I?ve known these people for a long time ? from long before my partner and I had first met.

    ?[My partner's] perspective differs from mine in several respects. I?ve held off much of my correspondence and have engaged in much self-censorship out of respect for that difference. My feeling is that her perspective arises mainly from her neurological damage.?

    In every encounter or answered letter I face two choices: (a) be honest, or (b) be silent. For a long time I?ve been silent. The third choice, (c) pretend, is unacceptable to me.

    Probably because, for a long time, I had pretended to myself that things couldn?t be as bad as they seemed. After all, my partner had kept insisting that she was okay. And I had grown up being told that so much was just my imagination and that I was overreacting to things. So what made this any different?

    Part of being a caregiver was learning to trust myself and my instincts again. I had worked hard to do that in the past. But my partner?s disorder was another layer of that proverbial onion. I had to take old lessons learned (really, older ?lessons? unlearned) and relearn them within a new framework.

    By the time I was done writing I had a three-page letter that still had some of the ?newsy? qualities that one expects in year-end missives. This time, the year-end letter came just from me. For now, at least, I replace our old tradition of sending letters together (discontinued years ago) with a new one of sending letters solo, so that I can express what I need to express.

    This time I?m also including Caregiving.com flyers. They are my go-to icebreaker. :-)


    (A hand sculpture I did from pulped paper years ago.)

    Part of my own difficulty lies in trying to gauge people?s responses. One friend had told me, once I spoke up, that she had wondered whether I had even noticed my partner?s strange behavior because I hadn?t said anything about it. I explained that I wasn?t going to call my partner out on it and publicly embarrass her, but that I had indeed noticed her behavior and had been noticing it for quite some time. In that particular case my partner had insisted on sitting on the floor at my friend?s house and had begun dry-brushing her teeth in the middle of a conversation, with the toothbrush she carried in her fanny pack. Whenever I had pointed her behavior out to her, usually after we had gotten home, she had rationalized it.

    That?s basically been my modus operandi: to let my partner simply be in the world. And, when called for, to pick up the pieces.

    But people do notice. There?s a reason a former neighbor of ours had told me, ?You know, she?s only going to get worse.? There?s a reason a friend of mine had warned me, five years ago, ?If you go down, you both go down.?

    The short note that I want to send is to someone who had met my partner only once, at a time when my partner had been on her best behavior. I don?t want to say much more than the basics because I want my partner to be treated with the decency and respect she deserves and without stigma attached.

    I don?t want my disclosures to create what I?ve taken to calling The Cootie Effect. My partner can be articulate and charming and seem as ?normal? as she does eccentric. She aches to be helpful and to be valued; who doesn?t? I don?t want my disclosures to close off potential avenues of participation for her. I want her to feel freer to interact with people, because isolation makes things worse ? for both of us.

    And yet, I want to be fair. To her. To me. To the people around us. It can feel like trying to balance on a thin, unraveling thread.

    2. Spoken word

    On Christmas Day my partner thanked me for not taking her to the hospital, back in October of 2011, when she had overdosed on diphenhydramine (Benadryl).

    She doesn?t want me to take her to the hospital if she overdoses again. She is afraid they will keep her there and perform more ?surgery? on her brain.

    I did not promise anything.

    I said, ?I want you to write your wishes down for me in a letter, and I want you to sign it.?

    She liked that idea, although she has not written the letter yet. (I am not holding my breath.) Despite what she had said in October of 2011 (?I have considered that, and I think that doesn?t stand up very much?), she now believes that a different diphenhydramine overdose ? not MS ? had been the cause of her 1982 hospitalization.

    She doesn?t recall overdosing back in 1982, but she says the overdosing itself had caused amnesia. She had ?remembered? ? though not until after her 2011 overdose ? a bottle of pills whose level had dropped. She now says the hospital had deliberately given her MS in 1982 because they knew that she had overdosed on diphenhydramine and therefore thought that she had been suicidal ? and that giving her MS was their way of ?fixing? her.

    Now she is saying that her neurologist and his staff knew about her ?brain surgery? and felt guilty about what happened 30 years ago, so they did something in her most recent MRI that helped alleviate her back problems from scoliosis.

    I have fallen into the practice of holding my tongue. I do not pretend to believe her, but I rarely challenge her openly. Because in the end, those words don?t matter.

    They don?t matter because despite the fact that we had spoken for more than 90 minutes on the day after her overdose in October of 2011, she had completely forgotten our conversation.

    Some days after that, she was angry with me when I gave her the transcript to read, because she thought that I had kept that information from her. She had not realized that she had overdosed at all.

    Whereas I thought she had remembered our 90-plus-minute talk.

    She doesn?t want me taking her to the hospital, the way her former partner had taken her to the hospital back in 1982. Just give her a few days, she said. Make sure she has enough water.

    I did not promise anything.

    Some day I might face the choice of whether or not to bring her in. It might be an overdose. It might be an exacerbation. It might be anything.

    On that day I will have to listen to my gut.

    Even after reading the transcript (which she says she?s done), my partner tells me I?ve got it wrong, and that she had not taken 200 mg. of diphenhydramine in October 2011.

    But I have the recording, in which she admits to having taken four green pills containing 12.5 mg each and six red pills containing 25 mg each.

    She can sound much better, but her halting and disorganized speech pattern is not unusual. She sounds worse the more stressed she feels. Her overdose last year had come two months before she was officially diagnosed with MS that acts like traumatic brain injury.

    When I remember and when I have the chance, I record our conversations now. When I feel emotionally strong enough I transcribe them. Both activities take practice.

    It?s not the button pushing that takes practice, or the typing. It?s bringing myself to do it.

    Otherwise, part of me wonders: Did this really happen? Did I really hear this?

    The digital recorder does not pretend.

    I posted this (along with the full transcript) on a friends-only diary on October 4, 2011:

    My partner was talking loudly enough in her sleep for me to hear her through my earplugs. I took my earplugs out and asked, ?What??

    Her words were badly slurred. I couldn?t understand what she was saying. When I thought I could hear her correctly, her syntax was way off, and I couldn?t understand what she meant.

    I rushed to the studio and got my digital recorder. I haven?t tried to transcribe from that conversation yet; the transcript below is the best quality sound and contains probably the most important information.

    She was unsteady on her feet as I helped her to the bathroom, and she would have fallen if I didn?t hold her up. She sat down hard on the toilet seat and had to stand up again to pull her pants down; for a moment I didn?t know if she was going to just pee right through them. But she was aware enough to take care of her hygiene.

    Getting her back into bed proved difficult. I had to convince her to move to where she could lie down on the mattress; she thought she was there when she wasn?t. She asked for water, which I got her; then she had to pee again. Then I helped her back to bed.

    A couple of times after that she began talking, I asked her what she was saying, and she accused me of talking and keeping her up. Finally she fell asleep, I could hear her snore, and I quietly left the bedroom.

    She had an appointment with the podiatrist, which I cancelled.

    Later she awoke and was steady on her feet. We started talking in the studio, and I surreptitiously turned on my computer recorder, whose mic isn?t as sensitive as the one on my digital recorder. When my partner left the room I grabbed my digital recorder, which I held as I followed her through the house.

    The transcript represents a shade over an hour and a half of talking. My partner speaks very slowly, with frequent, long pauses. Among other things, I learned from her that last night, in an attempt to sleep, she had taken ten pills (basically generic Benadryls, in two different strengths of diphenhydramine, for a total of 200 mg of diphenhydramine), followed by a half-bottle of beer, followed by what I measured out to be 5.33 ounces of brandy.

    Excerpt from our conversation on October 3, 2011

    ejourneys: So, are you saying you took four of those last night?

    Partner: That?s correct. There were two things that looked like this.

    ejourneys: Right.

    Partner: And I tried this. I tried one of these and, uh, ?cause this would be one diphenhydramine pill. So I, at first I had this, plus a little red lozenge.

    ejourneys: So, uh, the two pills that you took had 500 milligrams acetominophen, 30 milligrams pseudoepinephrine hydrochloride, 12.5 milligrams diphenhydramine hydrochloride.

    Partner: Right.

    ejourneys: And that?s per pill, and you took two of those.

    Partner: Right. The standard, I?ve been, I figured out that, um, one diphenhydramine pill doesn?t work for me. Uh, I?ve only ever tried that for allergy stuff.

    ejourneys: Right.

    Partner: And ?

    ejourneys: And you said on top of that, you took one of the red lozenges?

    Partner: No, more than that. Because ? okay, the small set of two?

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: Before last night, there were three sets of two there.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: So I took one of the sets of two. All right, yes. So there were three of these in here. I took this equivalent, plus this, uh, this used up for diphenhydramine, 12-packs. The 12-pack had three, three times three, to start with. So I took three of the reds plus this.

    ejourneys: Okay. Three red pills plus two ?

    Partner: Not at one ? yeah. Yes.

    ejourneys: But we?re talking within, what? Like, a 12-hour period?

    Partner: Yes.

    ejourneys: Okay. So, each red pill has 25 milligrams of diphenhydramine hydrochloride. Okay.

    Partner: Yeah. So, two of these plus the rest of one dose of diphenhydramine I hoped would knock me out. It didn?t.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: Uh, enter the beer. And pouring myself a half of a bottle, that didn?t knock me out.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: Uh ?

    ejourneys: And that?s when you turned to the brandy.

    Partner: Yes. And actually before that, there was this ? this ? this plus two pills, not asleep.

    ejourneys: Okay. So, two ? you?re saying two of the green pills plus two of the red pills? How many ?

    Partner: Actually, the first time, uh, I believe it was two of these and one of the reds.

    ejourneys: Two of the greens, one of the reds. Did you take any more pills after that?

    Partner: Yes. I ended up drawing down ? there were three of these sets of two in this box.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: You can see that there isn?t now. Um ?

    ejourneys: How many sets of two did you take?

    Partner: There were three of these. As I kept being aware that I?m not asleep, I ? I can go through, it?s like I would be down for ten minutes and realize, nope, not asleep, get up.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: And, um, so, and I, well, if one, I thought in terms of groups of, there was a time in my life when two diphenhydramines, I, okay, no, this is going to be about, um, this will be sleep and, uh, it won?t be another list of a week with no sleep. I didn?t add them to lists of other things, like blackouts. Um, just, I?m trying to be laborious and teach myself. Um, so I had thought this equals one red pill or red and white. And I know that one red pill is not going to do it. So I took an actual red pill.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: That was my first last night experience of pills. So, one plus two halves didn?t equal sleep. I took another this, and one diphenhydramine. That didn?t equal sleep.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: Somewhere in there, toward the end, I ? I memory thought there was a beer in the refrigerator. That wasn?t true. It ended up that I cracked open a bottle and I intentionally left the cap, um, out here.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: In ? in case of writing down. I didn?t write down, but I even wrote it down anyway. So, and I still hadn?t fallen asleep.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: The, uh, so it ended up that the night started with, in the red pill category, there were strips that had six of them. Um, this plus three, and then another this plus three. Still not asleep.

    ejourneys: Okay. When you say plus three, do you mean three red pills?

    Partner: I think so, yeah.

    ejourneys: Okay. So you said this plus three twice.

    Partner: Yeah.

    ejourneys: When you said this, you lifted the two green pills.

    Partner: Uh huh.

    ejourneys: So that happens, this plus three twice ?

    Partner: Right.

    ejourneys: We?re talking now a total of ten pills.

    Partner: A different ? no, don?t, please don?t, um, add these to the red pill count, because they?re different.

    ejourneys: Right. But ? okay, so this plus three, twice, means you have taken four of the green pills and six of the red pills. Is that correct?

    Partner: In total.

    ejourneys: Over the past, say, 12 hours or so.

    Partner: There was definitely four of these.

    ejourneys: Four of the green pills.

    Partner: Taken because the night started out with two packets like that.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: Three packets like that in this box. It?s now two of the pills, one of the packets. So, four out of what looks like that.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: Six out of the red pills. One half of a beer. And the half, the jigger, I still wasn?t asleep. Um, I think I was even thinking of having more than one jigger, so I didn?t keep returning. But I actually controlled myself and had only one additional jigger.

    ejourneys: So two jiggers of brandy.

    Partner: Yes.

    ejourneys: Is a jigger about an ounce?

    Partner: Uh, well, the item I used is, well, the first time I rinsed it out, and the second time I didn?t, because I think the cold water on my hand was waking me up.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: So I set it somewhere to dry. It was the little starry night cup.

    ejourneys: Okay. So I think that?s probably an ounce or an ounce and a half, maybe. I can measure it out.

    Partner: Yeah.

    ejourneys: We?ll find it when we find it.

    Partner: Yes. There were two times I was going to that liquor cabinet.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: Actually, um, I was thinking that the water on my hand made awakeness happen.

    ejourneys: Ah, there it is.

    Partner: Okay.

    ejourneys: We can measure that out.

    Partner: Yeah. And I think I filled it up to, um, about there both times.

    ejourneys: All right. So about a half inch from the top.

    Partner: Something like that.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: And, uh, it does [inaudible; something about residue] ?

    ejourneys: I can feel it on my, uh, my hand, yeah.

    Partner: [inaudible] I rinsed it out.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: [inaudible; water running]

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: And there might be some sticky from this, from the second jigger.

    ejourneys: So, the measuring cup is showing ?

    Partner: Please move away from the sink.

    ejourneys: Uh huh.

    Partner: I need to rinse off.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: I mean ?

    ejourneys: Right.

    Partner: Thank you. So at one point, I didn?t take two jiggers.

    ejourneys: Right.

    Partner: At any given point ?

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: There was only one jigger involved.

    ejourneys: The measuring cup shows about a third of a cup for the contents of that starry night.

    Partner: And it was the first jigger didn?t knock me out, maybe because of rinsing.

    ejourneys: Mm hm.

    Partner: I went back out, didn?t have the other half beer, but did have another jigger.

    ejourneys: Okay.

    Partner: And that was, I didn?t ? I don?t think I had any more pills after seeing what alcohol could do for me.

    [end of excerpt]

    On Friday my partner asked me what emotions I feel when she tells me her theories. I told her that I feel numb.

    She thought that meant that she was boring me to tears.

    ?Not boring,? I said. ?Not tears. Just numb.?

    I don?t know how she interprets my answer, but she accepted it.

    I did not say that underneath my numbness I feel anger, impatience, and much dismay. I feel numb from clamping down on them and presenting a calm exterior ? because I can?t tell her not to believe what she needs to believe. I can?t tell her that every time she expounds on a new conspiracy theory I want to get her fitted for one of these:

    Because heck, if one?s going to wear a tinfoil hat, it might as well be faaabulous.

    Source: http://www.caregiving.com/2012/12/communications-2/

    kennedy demi moore roy oswalt kevin martin 2012 senior bowl chuck series finale welcome back kotter

    So that was 2012?. ? Tom's Cruise Blog

    So that was 2012. It was an eventful and interesting year for us. I suppose it?s traditional around this time to review the year that?s just gone by, so here goes. This being a personal blog, this is a personal review ? this is what seemed important, memorable or significant to us.

    First on any list has to be the sinking of the Costa Concordia, on 13 January. 30 people are known to have died and another two are missing, presumed dead, which brings the total of dead to 32. A further 64 people were injured to various degrees of severity. The investigation is still on-going, as are the trials ? the Captain has been charged with manslaughter, together with lesser charges ? and the hulk of the ship still lies in the water off Isola del Giglio. There was palpable shock throughout the cruise industry, indeed throughout the leisure travel industry, at these events ? how could a modern ship, incorporating the latest safety features and built to the highest standards, sink? Well, any floating object will cease to float if a big enough hole is punched in it below the waterline, and that?s what happened to Costa Concordia. The principal question is: exactly how did that come to happen? ? we still await the official report. Two more superlatives about this tragedy: first, she is by far the largest passenger ship to sink; and second, she may also be the most successful rescue operation, in that over 4,000 people got off her to safety. That said, I must also recognise that it was most fortunate that the sinking occurred so close to shore ? many people were able to swim to safety, and some people still in the water were picked up by local boats. Had the sinking occurred further out, or had she not come to rest on the shelf of rock, the death toll would have been much higher.

    Next was the P&O Grand Event on 3 July. Not surprisingly in this record-breakingly-wet year it was raining during the Event itself and that did take some of the edge off it, but it was still fun in a very British masochistic way.

    Third would be our long cruise this year, on Arcadia to the Canaries. It wasn?t the best cruise we?ve ever had but it was still enjoyable and we certainly found a lot to enjoy on Arcadia.

    Finally would be the introduction by Cunard and P&O of the new fare schemes. P&O calls them ?Vantage? fares: once you?ve booked such a fare you?ll get some recompense (probably
    in the form of on-board credit) if the fare is subsequently reduced. There have been a lot of negative comments about this initiative, and I do recognise the way it could be abused ? for example if the cruise line labels all reduced fares as ?Getaway? fares then that doesn?t count as a reduction to the Vantagef are, so no compensation would be due. However I think it should be welcomed. US passengers have enjoyed protection like this for years, and now we may get it as well.

    That?s about it. There were a lot of other stories in what was I think a tight year for UK cruising, and there are some indications that 2013 will be even tighter. But the stories for this year have not yet emerged; when they do, and if they seem interesting, I?ll blog about them here.

    And finally, I?d like to wish all my readers a happy and successful New Year.

    Like this:

    Be the first to like this.

    Source: http://tomscruiseblog.co.uk/2013/01/01/so-that-was-2012/

    dale george will obama birth certificate nick cannon lindsay lohan saturday night live snl lindsay lohan valley fever

    মঙ্গলবার, ১ জানুয়ারি, ২০১৩

    Not solved yet: GOP wants more cliff spending cuts

    House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va. leaves a Republican caucus meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. Squarely in the spotlight, House Republicans began deciding their next move Tuesday after the Senate overwhelmingly approved compromise legislation negating a fiscal cliff of across-the-board tax increases and sweeping spending cuts to the Pentagon and other government agencies. Cantor says he opposed the Senate bill. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

    House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va. leaves a Republican caucus meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. Squarely in the spotlight, House Republicans began deciding their next move Tuesday after the Senate overwhelmingly approved compromise legislation negating a fiscal cliff of across-the-board tax increases and sweeping spending cuts to the Pentagon and other government agencies. Cantor says he opposed the Senate bill. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

    House Speaker John Boehner Ohio walks to his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013, as legislation to negate a fiscal cliff of across-the-board tax increases and sweeping spending cuts moves to the GOP-dominated House following a bipartisan, middle-of-the-night approval in the Senate. Boehner is expected to encounter opposition from conservatives within his own party. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Vice President Joe Biden arrives for a closed-door meeting with House Democrats, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013, to discuss the fiscal cliff bill passed by the Senate last night that's waiting for a vote in the Republican-controlled House. At left is Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif. Biden who has been shuttling between the White House and Capitol Hill to help negotiate a legislative path to avert the across-the-board tax increases and sweeping spending cuts that could damage the economy. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., center, flanked by Rep. Joseph Crowley, D-NY, left, and Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013, to discuss the fiscal cliff bill passed by the Senate last night that's waiting for a vote in the Republican-controlled House. The House Democrats met earlier with Vice President Joe Biden who has been shuttling between the White House and Capitol Hill to help negotiate a legislative path to avert the across-the-board tax increases and sweeping spending cuts that could damage the economy. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio leaves a Republican caucus on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. Squarely in the spotlight, House Republicans leaders shopped a Senate-approved "fiscal cliff" compromise to rank-and-file colleagues on New Year's Day and heard concerns that the accord lacked sufficient spending cuts. Vice President Joe Biden tried rallying House Democrats behind the deal in a separate meeting. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

    (AP) ? Emergency legislation to avoid the economy-threatening fiscal cliff ran into vehement New Year's Day opposition from House Republicans, casting doubt on the divided government's ability to prevent widespread tax increases and painful, across-the-board federal spending cuts.

    "I do not support the bill. We are looking, though, for the best path forward," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., declared after a closed-door meeting of his party's rank and file.

    While Speaker John Boehner took no public position, an attempt to add spending cuts was all but certain before the leadership called for a final House vote on the measure that cleared the Senate hours earlier in a pre-dawn vote of 89-8.

    Any change in the legislation would require the Senate to re-pass the measure before it could go to President Barack Obama for his signature, and his aides met at the White House to review the bill's prospects.

    There was no immediate response to the House Republicans from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., or from Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who negotiated the final bill with Vice President Joe Biden.

    It wasn't the first time that the tea party-infused House Republican majority has rebelled against the party establishment since the GOP took control of the chamber 24 months ago. But with the two-year term set to end Thursday at noon, it was likely the last. And as was true in earlier cases of a threatened default and government shutdown, the brinkmanship came on a matter of economic urgency, leaving the party open to a public backlash if tax increases do take effect on tens of millions.

    Economists have warned that without action by Congress, the tax increases and spending cuts that technically took effect with the turn of the new year at midnight could send the economy into recession.

    The Senate-passed bill was designed to prevent that while providing for tax increases at upper incomes, as Obama campaigned for in his successful bid for a second term.

    It would also prevent an expiration of extended unemployment benefits for an estimated two million jobless, block a 27 percent cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients, stop a $900 pay increase for lawmakers from taking effect in March and head off a threatened spike in milk prices.

    At the same time, it would stop $24 billion in spending cuts set to take effect over the next two months, although only about half of that total would be offset with spending reductions elsewhere in the budget.

    The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure would add nearly $4 trillion over a decade to federal deficits, a calculation that assumed taxes would otherwise have risen on taxpayers at all income levels. There was little or no evident concern among Republicans on that point, presumably because of their belief that tax cuts pay for themselves by expanding economic growth and do not cause deficits to rise.

    The relative paucity of spending cuts was a sticking point with many House Republicans. Among other items, the extension of unemployment benefits costs $30 billion, and is not offset by savings elsewhere.

    "I personally hate it," said Rep. John Campbell of California. "The speaker the day after the election said we would give on taxes and we have. But we wanted spending cuts. This bill has spending increases. Are you kidding me? So we get tax increases and spending increases? Come on."

    Others said unhappiness over spending outweighed fears that the financial markets will plunge on Wednesday if the fiscal cliff hasn't been averted.

    "There's a concern about the markets, but there's a bigger concern, which is getting this right, which is something we haven't been very good at over the past two years," said Rep. Steve LaTourette of Ohio.

    House Democrats met privately with Biden for their review of the measure, and the party's leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, said afterward that Boehner should permit a vote.

    "That is what we expect. That is what the American people deserve," she said.

    For all the struggle involved in the legislation, even its passage would merely clear the way for another round of controversy almost as soon as the new Congress convenes.

    With the Treasury expected to need an expansion in borrowing authority by early spring, and funding authority for most government programs set to expire in late March, Republicans have made it clear they intend to use those events as leverage with the administration to win savings from Medicare and other government benefit programs.

    McConnell said as much moments before the 2 a.m. Tuesday vote in the Senate ? two hours after the advertised "cliff" deadline.

    "We've taken care of the revenue side of this debate. Now it's time to get serious about reducing Washington's out-of-control spending," he said. "That's a debate the American people want. It's the debate we'll have next. And it's a debate Republicans are ready for."

    The 89-8 vote in the Senate was unexpectedly lopsided.

    Despite grumbling from liberals that Obama had given way too much in the bargaining, only two Democrats opposed the measure.

    Among the Republican supporters were Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, an ardent opponent of tax increases, as well as Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, elected to his seat two years ago with tea party support.

    It marked the first time in two decades that Republicans willingly supported higher taxes, in this case on incomes over $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for couples. Taxes also would rise on estates greater than $5 million in size, and on capital gains and dividend income made by the wealthy.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Larry Margasak and Julie Pace contributed to this story.

    Associated Press

    Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2013-01-01-Fiscal%20Cliff/id-f82dd30aa0d741c2aa5e31502fbb0224

    Turkey Cooking Time Kmart Black Friday PlanetSide 2 Alexis DeJoria danica patrick sweet potato casserole turkey